| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| PinchTab is a standalone HTTP server that gives AI agents direct control over a Chrome browser. PinchTab v0.8.3 contains a server-side request forgery issue in the optional scheduler's webhook delivery path. When a task is submitted to `POST /tasks` with a user-controlled `callbackUrl`, the v0.8.3 scheduler sends an outbound HTTP `POST` to that URL when the task reaches a terminal state. In that release, the webhook path validated only the URL scheme and did not reject loopback, private, link-local, or other non-public destinations. Because the v0.8.3 implementation also used the default HTTP client behavior, redirects were followed and the destination was not pinned to validated IPs. This allowed blind SSRF from the PinchTab server to attacker-chosen HTTP(S) targets reachable from the server. This issue is narrower than a general unauthenticated internet-facing SSRF. The scheduler is optional and off by default, and in token-protected deployments the attacker must already be able to submit tasks using the server's master API token. In PinchTab's intended deployment model, that token represents administrative control rather than a low-privilege role. Tokenless deployments lower the barrier further, but that is a separate insecure configuration state rather than impact created by the webhook bug itself. PinchTab's default deployment model is local-first and user-controlled, with loopback bind and token-based access in the recommended setup. That lowers practical risk in default use, even though it does not remove the underlying webhook issue when the scheduler is enabled and reachable. This was addressed in v0.8.4 by validating callback targets before dispatch, rejecting non-public IP ranges, pinning delivery to validated IPs, disabling redirect following, and validating `callbackUrl` during task submission. |
| A vulnerability was identified in Page-Replica Page Replica up to e4a7f52e75093ee318b4d5a9a9db6751050d2ad0. The impacted element is the function sitemap.fetch of the file /sitemap of the component Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A weakness has been identified in mingSoft MCMS up to 5.5.0. This issue affects the function catchImage of the file net/mingsoft/cms/action/BaseAction.java of the component Editor Endpoint. Executing a manipulation of the argument catchimage can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. |
| A security vulnerability has been detected in letta-ai letta 0.16.4. This vulnerability affects the function _convert_message_create_to_message of the file letta/helpers/message_helper.py of the component File URL Handler. Such manipulation of the argument ImageContent leads to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the AnnounContent of the /admin/read.php in OTCMS V7.66 and before. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to craft HTTP requests, without authentication, containing a URL pointing to internal services or any remote server |
| WWBN AVideo is an open source video platform. In versions up to and including 26.0, `isSSRFSafeURL()` validates URLs against private/reserved IP ranges before fetching, but `url_get_contents()` follows HTTP redirects without re-validating the redirect target. An attacker can bypass SSRF protection by redirecting from a public URL to an internal target. Commit 8b7e9dad359d5fac69e0cbbb370250e0b284bc12 contains a patch. |
| Spring AI's spring-ai-bedrock-converse contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in BedrockProxyChatModel when processing multimodal messages that include user-supplied media URLs. Insufficient validation of those URLs allows an attacker to induce the server to issue HTTP requests to unintended internal or external destinations.
This issue affects Spring AI: from 1.0.0 before 1.0.5, from 1.1.0 before 1.1.4. |
| LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. Prior to version 0.8.3, `isPrivateIP()` in `packages/api/src/auth/domain.ts` fails to detect IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses in their hex-normalized form, allowing any authenticated user to bypass SSRF protection and make the server issue HTTP requests to internal network resources — including cloud metadata services (e.g., AWS `169.254.169.254`), loopback, and RFC1918 ranges. Version 0.8.3 fixes the issue. |
| calibre is a cross-platform e-book manager for viewing, converting, editing, and cataloging e-books. Prior to version 9.6.0, a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the background-image endpoint of calibre e-book reader's web view allows an attacker to perform blind GET requests to arbitrary URLs and exfiltrate information out from the ebook sandbox. Version 9.6.0 patches the issue. |
| Lemmy is a link aggregator and forum for the fediverse. Prior to version 0.7.0-beta.9, the `v4_is_invalid()` function in `activitypub-federation-rust` (`src/utils.rs`) does not check for `Ipv4Addr::UNSPECIFIED` (0.0.0.0). An unauthenticated attacker controlling a remote domain can point it to 0.0.0.0, bypass the SSRF protection introduced by the fix for CVE-2025-25194 (GHSA-7723-35v7-qcxw), and reach localhost services on the target server. Version 0.7.0-beta.9 patches the issue. |
| A vulnerability was found in vanna-ai vanna up to 2.0.2. Affected by this vulnerability is the function update_sql/run_sql of the file src/vanna/legacy/flask/__init__.py of the component Endpoint. Performing a manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| Raytha CMS is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in the “Themes - Import from URL” feature. It allows an attacker with high privileges to provide the URL for redirecting server-side HTTP request.
This issue was fixed in version 1.4.6. |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Exchange allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure MCP Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Bing allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network. |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Purview allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Purview allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure Cloud Shell allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. |
| Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure IoT Explorer allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. |
| Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to version 2.2.1, the migration helper functions `DownloadFile` and `DownloadFileWithHeaders` in `pkg/modules/migration/helpers.go` make arbitrary HTTP GET requests without any SSRF protection. When a user triggers a Todoist or Trello migration, file attachment URLs from the third-party API response are passed directly to these functions, allowing an attacker to force the Vikunja server to fetch internal network resources and return the response as a downloadable task attachment. Version 2.2.1 patches the issue. |
