Export limit exceeded: 342239 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (342239 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-34236 | 1 Auth0 | 1 Auth0-php | 2026-04-03 | 8.2 High |
| Auth0-PHP is a PHP SDK for Auth0 Authentication and Management APIs. From version 8.0.0 to before version 8.19.0, in applications built with the Auth0 PHP SDK, cookies are encrypted with insufficient entropy, which may result in threat actors brute-forcing the encryption key and forging session cookies. This issue has been patched in version 8.19.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34376 | 1 Mrmn2 | 1 Pdfding | 2026-04-03 | 7.5 High |
| PdfDing is a selfhosted PDF manager, viewer and editor offering a seamless user experience on multiple devices. Prior to version 1.7.0, an access-control vulnerability allows unauthenticated users to retrieve password-protected shared PDFs by directly calling the file-serving endpoint without completing the password verification flow. This results in unauthorized access to confidential documents that users expected to be protected by a shared-link password. This issue has been patched in version 1.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34397 | 1 Himmelblau-idm | 1 Himmelblau | 2026-04-03 | 6.3 Medium |
| Himmelblau is an interoperability suite for Microsoft Azure Entra ID and Intune. From versions 2.0.0-alpha to before 2.3.9 and 3.0.0-alpha to before 3.1.1, there is a conditional local privilege escalation vulnerability in an edge-case naming collision. Only authenticated himmelblau users whose mapped CN/short name exactly matches a privileged local group name (e.g., "sudo", "wheel", "docker", "adm") can cause the NSS module to resolve that group name to their fake primary group. If the system uses NSS results for group-based authorization decisions (sudo, polkit, etc.), this can grant the attacker the privileges of that group. This issue has been patched in versions 2.3.9 and 3.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34516 | 1 Aio-libs | 1 Aiohttp | 2026-04-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to version 3.13.4, a response with an excessive number of multipart headers may be allowed to use more memory than intended, potentially allowing a DoS vulnerability. This issue has been patched in version 3.13.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34519 | 1 Aio-libs | 1 Aiohttp | 2026-04-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| AIOHTTP is an asynchronous HTTP client/server framework for asyncio and Python. Prior to version 3.13.4, an attacker who controls the reason parameter when creating a Response may be able to inject extra headers or similar exploits. This issue has been patched in version 3.13.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34528 | 1 Filebrowser | 1 Filebrowser | 2026-04-03 | 8.1 High |
| File Browser is a file managing interface for uploading, deleting, previewing, renaming, and editing files within a specified directory. Prior to version 2.62.2, the signupHandler in File Browser applies default user permissions via d.settings.Defaults.Apply(user), then strips only Admin. The Execute permission and Commands list from the default user template are not stripped. When an administrator has enabled signup, server-side execution, and set Execute=true in the default user template, any unauthenticated user who self-registers inherits shell execution capabilities and can run arbitrary commands on the server. This issue has been patched in version 2.62.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34531 | 1 Miguelgrinberg | 1 Flask-httpauth | 2026-04-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Flask-HTTPAuth provides Basic, Digest and Token HTTP authentication for Flask routes. Prior to version 4.8.1, in a situation where the client makes a request to a token protected resource without passing a token, or passing an empty token, Flask-HTTPAuth would invoke the application's token verification callback function with the token argument set to an empty string. If the application had any users in its database with an empty string set as their token, then it could potentially authenticate the client request against any of those users. This issue has been patched in version 4.8.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34559 | 1 Ci4-cms-erp | 1 Ci4ms | 2026-04-03 | 9.1 Critical |
| CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input when creating or editing blog tags. An attacker can inject a malicious JavaScript payload into the tag name field, which is then stored server-side. This stored payload is later rendered unsafely across public tag pages and administrative interfaces without proper output encoding, leading to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34561 | 1 Ci4-cms-erp | 1 Ci4ms | 2026-04-03 | 4.7 Medium |
| CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input within System Settings – Social Media Management. Multiple configuration fields, including Social Media and Social Media Link, accept attacker-controlled input that is stored server-side and later rendered without proper output encoding. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34563 | 1 Ci4-cms-erp | 1 Ci4ms | 2026-04-03 | 9.1 Critical |
| CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input when handling backup uploads and processing backup metadata. An attacker can inject a malicious JavaScript payload into the backup filename via the uploaded xss.sql, which uses SQL functionality to insert the XSS payload server-side. This stored payload is later rendered unsafely in multiple backup management views without proper output encoding, leading to stored blind cross-site scripting (Blind XSS). This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34566 | 1 Ci4-cms-erp | 1 Ci4ms | 2026-04-03 | 9.1 Critical |
| CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input within the Page Management functionality when creating or editing pages. Multiple input fields accept attacker-controlled JavaScript payloads that are stored server-side. These stored values are later rendered without proper output encoding across administrative page lists and public-facing page views, leading to stored DOM-based cross-site scripting (XSS). This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34567 | 1 Ci4-cms-erp | 1 Ci4ms | 2026-04-03 | 9.1 Critical |
| CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application fails to properly sanitize user-controlled input when creating or editing blog posts within the Categories section. An attacker can inject a malicious JavaScript payload into the Categories content, which is then stored server-side. This stored payload is later rendered unsafely when the Categories are viewed via blog posts, without proper output encoding, leading to stored cross-site scripting (XSS). This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34572 | 1 Ci4-cms-erp | 1 Ci4ms | 2026-04-03 | 8.8 High |
| CI4MS is a CodeIgniter 4-based CMS skeleton that delivers a production-ready, modular architecture with RBAC authorization and theme support. Prior to version 0.31.0.0, the application fails to immediately revoke active user sessions when an account is deactivated. Due to a logic flaw in the backend design, account state changes are enforced only during authentication (login), not for already-established sessions. The system implicitly assumes that authenticated users remain trusted for the lifetime of their session. There is no session expiration or account expiration mechanism in place, causing deactivated accounts to retain indefinite access until the user manually logs out. This behavior breaks the intended access control policy and results in persistent unauthorized access, representing a critical security flaw. This issue has been patched in version 0.31.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34604 | 1 Tina | 1 Tinacms | 2026-04-03 | 7.1 High |
| Tina is a headless content management system. Prior to version 2.2.2, @tinacms/graphql uses string-based path containment checks in FilesystemBridge. That blocks plain ../ traversal, but it does not resolve symlink or junction targets. If a symlink/junction already exists under the allowed content root, a path like content/posts/pivot/owned.md is still considered "inside" the base even though the real filesystem target can be outside it. As a result, FilesystemBridge.get(), put(), delete(), and glob() can operate on files outside the intended root. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34729 | 1 Thorsten | 1 Phpmyfaq | 2026-04-03 | 6.1 Medium |
| phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. Prior to version 4.1.1, there is a stored XSS vulnerability via Regex Bypass in Filter::removeAttributes(). This issue has been patched in version 4.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34803 | 1 Endian | 1 Firewall | 2026-04-03 | 6.4 Medium |
| Endian Firewall version 3.3.25 and prior allow stored cross-site scripting (XSS) via the name parameter to /manage/qos/classes/. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary JavaScript that is stored and executed when other users view the affected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34807 | 1 Endian | 1 Firewall | 2026-04-03 | 6.4 Medium |
| Endian Firewall version 3.3.25 and prior allow stored cross-site scripting (XSS) via the remark parameter to /cgi-bin/incoming.cgi. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary JavaScript that is stored and executed when other users view the affected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-35168 | 1 Devcode | 1 Openstamanager | 2026-04-03 | 8.8 High |
| OpenSTAManager is an open source management software for technical assistance and invoicing. Prior to version 2.10.2, the Aggiornamenti (Updates) module in OpenSTAManager contains a database conflict resolution feature (op=risolvi-conflitti-database) that accepts a JSON array of SQL statements via POST and executes them directly against the database without any validation, allowlist, or sanitization. An authenticated attacker with access to the Aggiornamenti module can execute arbitrary SQL statements including CREATE, DROP, ALTER, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, SELECT INTO OUTFILE, and any other SQL command supported by the MySQL server. Foreign key checks are explicitly disabled before execution (SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0), further reducing database integrity protections. This issue has been patched in version 2.10.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4364 | 1 Ibm | 4 Security Verify Access, Security Verify Access Container, Verify Identity Access and 1 more | 2026-04-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Verify Identity Access Container 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access Container 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 and IBM Verify Identity Access 11.0 through 11.0.2 and IBM Security Verify Access 10.0 through 10.0.9.1 allows certificate listings retrieved via a browser session to return a JSON payload while incorrectly specifying the response Content-Type as text/html. Because the content is delivered with an HTML MIME type, browsers may interpret the JSON data as executable script under certain conditions. This creates an opportunity for JavaScript injection, potentially leading to cross-site scripting (XSS). | ||||
| CVE-2026-4636 | 1 Redhat | 2 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak | 2026-04-03 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak. An authenticated user with the uma_protection role can bypass User-Managed Access (UMA) policy validation. This allows the attacker to include resource identifiers owned by other users in a policy creation request, even if the URL path specifies an attacker-owned resource. Consequently, the attacker gains unauthorized permissions to victim-owned resources, enabling them to obtain a Requesting Party Token (RPT) and access sensitive information or perform unauthorized actions. | ||||