Export limit exceeded: 342057 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (2770 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-3161 | 1 Apache | 1 Hadoop | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The HDFS web UI in Apache Hadoop before 2.7.0 is vulnerable to a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack through an unescaped query parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3162 | 1 Apache | 1 Hadoop | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| HDFS clients interact with a servlet on the DataNode to browse the HDFS namespace. The NameNode is provided as a query parameter that is not validated in Apache Hadoop before 2.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3159 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Camel, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Camel's camel-snakeyaml component is vulnerable to Java object de-serialization vulnerability. De-serializing untrusted data can lead to security flaws. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1622 | 1 Apache | 1 Ofbiz | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache OFBiz 10.04.x before 10.04.02 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3163 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Solr, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| When using the Index Replication feature, Apache Solr nodes can pull index files from a master/leader node using an HTTP API which accepts a file name. However, Solr before 5.5.4 and 6.x before 6.4.1 did not validate the file name, hence it was possible to craft a special request involving path traversal, leaving any file readable to the Solr server process exposed. Solr servers protected and restricted by firewall rules and/or authentication would not be at risk since only trusted clients and users would gain direct HTTP access. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3156 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Cxf, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The OAuth2 Hawk and JOSE MAC Validation code in Apache CXF prior to 3.0.13 and 3.1.x prior to 3.1.10 is not using a constant time MAC signature comparison algorithm which may be exploited by sophisticated timing attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3165 | 1 Apache | 1 Brooklyn | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Brooklyn before 0.10.0, the REST server is vulnerable to cross-site scripting where one authenticated user can cause scripts to run in the browser of another user authorized to access the first user's resources. This is due to improper escaping of server-side content. There is known to be a proof-of-concept exploit using this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2017-5640 | 1 Apache | 1 Impala | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| It was noticed that a malicious process impersonating an Impala daemon in Apache Impala (incubating) 2.7.0 to 2.8.0 could cause Impala daemons to skip authentication checks when Kerberos is enabled (but TLS is not). If the malicious server responds with 'COMPLETE' before the SASL handshake has completed, the client will consider the handshake as completed even though no exchange of credentials has happened. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4434 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Tika, Jboss Bpms, Jboss Data Virtualization and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Tika before 1.13 does not properly initialize the XML parser or choose handlers, which might allow remote attackers to conduct XML External Entity (XXE) attacks via vectors involving (1) spreadsheets in OOXML files and (2) XMP metadata in PDF and other file formats, a related issue to CVE-2016-2175. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0881 | 1 Apache | 1 Xerces2 Java | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Xerces2 Java Parser before 2.12.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted message to an XML service, which triggers hash table collisions. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3157 | 3 Apache, Debian, Redhat | 9 Openoffice, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| By exploiting the way Apache OpenOffice before 4.1.4 renders embedded objects, an attacker could craft a document that allows reading in a file from the user's filesystem. Information could be retrieved by the attacker by, e.g., using hidden sections to store the information, tricking the user into saving the document and convincing the user to send the document back to the attacker. The vulnerability is mitigated by the need for the attacker to know the precise file path in the target system, and the need to trick the user into saving the document and sending it back. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0880 | 1 Apache | 1 Xerces-c\+\+ | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Xerces-C++ allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted message sent to an XML service that causes hash table collisions. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3153 | 1 Apache | 1 Atlas | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0-incubating and 0.7.0-incubating were found vulnerable to Reflected XSS in the search functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2016-3090 | 1 Apache | 1 Struts | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The TextParseUtil.translateVariables method in Apache Struts 2.x before 2.3.20 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted OGNL expression with ANTLR tooling. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0803 | 1 Apache | 1 Cxf | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The WS-SP UsernameToken policy in Apache CXF 2.4.5 and 2.5.1 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by sending an empty UsernameToken as part of a SOAP request. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3154 | 1 Apache | 1 Atlas | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Error responses from Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0-incubating and 0.7.0-incubating included stack trace, exposing excessive information. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3152 | 1 Apache | 1 Atlas | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0-incubating and 0.7.0-incubating were found vulnerable to DOM XSS in the edit-tag functionality. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3155 | 1 Apache | 1 Atlas | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Apache Atlas versions 0.6.0-incubating and 0.7.0-incubating were found vulnerable to cross frame scripting. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15702 | 1 Apache | 1 Qpid Broker-j | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| In Apache Qpid Broker-J 0.18 through 0.32, if the broker is configured with different authentication providers on different ports one of which is an HTTP port, then the broker can be tricked by a remote unauthenticated attacker connecting to the HTTP port into using an authentication provider that was configured on a different port. The attacker still needs valid credentials with the authentication provider on the spoofed port. This becomes an issue when the spoofed port has weaker authentication protection (e.g., anonymous access, default accounts) and is normally protected by firewall rules or similar which can be circumvented by this vulnerability. AMQP ports are not affected. Versions 6.0.0 and newer are not affected. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15707 | 3 Apache, Netapp, Oracle | 12 Struts, Oncommand Balance, Agile Plm Framework and 9 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Apache Struts 2.5 to 2.5.14, the REST Plugin is using an outdated JSON-lib library which is vulnerable and allow perform a DoS attack using malicious request with specially crafted JSON payload. | ||||