Export limit exceeded: 342201 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 342201 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 17428 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 342201 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (342201 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-34363 | 2 Parse Community, Parseplatform | 2 Parse Server, Parse-server | 2026-04-03 | 5.3 Medium |
| Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to versions 8.6.65 and 9.7.0-alpha.9, when multiple clients subscribe to the same class via LiveQuery, the event handlers process each subscriber concurrently using shared mutable objects. The sensitive data filter modifies these shared objects in-place, so when one subscriber's filter removes a protected field, subsequent subscribers may receive the already-filtered object. This can cause protected fields and authentication data to leak to clients that should not see them, or cause clients that should see the data to receive an incomplete object. Additionally, when an afterEvent Cloud Code trigger is registered, one subscriber's trigger modifications can leak to other subscribers through the same shared mutable state. Any Parse Server deployment using LiveQuery with protected fields or afterEvent triggers is affected when multiple clients subscribe to the same class. This issue has been patched in versions 8.6.65 and 9.7.0-alpha.9. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34373 | 2 Parse Community, Parseplatform | 2 Parse Server, Parse-server | 2026-04-03 | 8.8 High |
| Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to versions 8.6.66 and 9.7.0-alpha.10, the GraphQL API endpoint does not respect the allowOrigin server option and unconditionally allows cross-origin requests from any website. This bypasses origin restrictions that operators configure to control which websites can interact with the Parse Server API. The REST API correctly enforces the configured allowOrigin restriction. This issue has been patched in versions 8.6.66 and 9.7.0-alpha.10. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34532 | 2 Parse Community, Parseplatform | 2 Parse Server, Parse-server | 2026-04-03 | 9.1 Critical |
| Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to versions 8.6.67 and 9.7.0-alpha.11, an attacker can bypass Cloud Function validator access controls by appending "prototype.constructor" to the function name in the URL. When a Cloud Function handler is declared using the function keyword and its validator is a plain object or arrow function, the trigger store traversal resolves the handler through its own prototype chain while the validator store fails to mirror this traversal, causing all access control enforcement to be skipped. This allows unauthenticated callers to invoke Cloud Functions that are meant to be protected by validators such as requireUser, requireMaster, or custom validation logic. This issue has been patched in versions 8.6.67 and 9.7.0-alpha.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34573 | 2 Parse Community, Parseplatform | 2 Parse Server, Parse-server | 2026-04-03 | 7.5 High |
| Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to versions 8.6.68 and 9.7.0-alpha.12, the GraphQL query complexity validator can be exploited to cause a denial-of-service by sending a crafted query with binary fan-out fragment spreads. A single unauthenticated request can block the Node.js event loop for seconds, denying service to all concurrent users. This only affects deployments that have enabled the requestComplexity.graphQLDepth or requestComplexity.graphQLFields configuration options. This issue has been patched in versions 8.6.68 and 9.7.0-alpha.12. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34574 | 2 Parse Community, Parseplatform | 2 Parse Server, Parse-server | 2026-04-03 | 5.4 Medium |
| Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to versions 8.6.69 and 9.7.0-alpha.14, an authenticated user can bypass the immutability guard on session fields (expiresAt, createdWith) by sending a null value in a PUT request to the session update endpoint. This allows nullifying the session expiry, making the session valid indefinitely and bypassing configured session length policies. This issue has been patched in versions 8.6.69 and 9.7.0-alpha.14. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34595 | 2 Parse Community, Parseplatform | 2 Parse Server, Parse-server | 2026-04-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| Parse Server is an open source backend that can be deployed to any infrastructure that can run Node.js. Prior to versions 8.6.70 and 9.7.0-alpha.18, an authenticated user with find class-level permission can bypass the protectedFields class-level permission setting on LiveQuery subscriptions. By sending a subscription with a $or, $and, or $nor operator value as a plain object with numeric keys and a length property (an "array-like" object) instead of an array, the protected-field guard is bypassed. The subscription event firing acts as a binary oracle, allowing the attacker to infer whether a protected field matches a given test value. This issue has been patched in versions 8.6.70 and 9.7.0-alpha.18. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5211 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 60 Dnr-202l, Dnr-322l, Dnr-326 and 57 more | 2026-04-03 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw has been found in D-Link DNS-120, DNR-202L, DNS-315L, DNS-320, DNS-320L, DNS-320LW, DNS-321, DNR-322L, DNS-323, DNS-325, DNS-326, DNS-327L, DNR-326, DNS-340L, DNS-343, DNS-345, DNS-726-4, DNS-1100-4, DNS-1200-05 and DNS-1550-04 up to 20260205. This vulnerability affects the function UPnP_AV_Server_Path_Del of the file /cgi-bin/app_mgr.cgi. Executing a manipulation of the argument f_dir can lead to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5213 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 60 Dnr-202l, Dnr-322l, Dnr-326 and 57 more | 2026-04-03 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability was determined in D-Link DNS-120, DNR-202L, DNS-315L, DNS-320, DNS-320L, DNS-320LW, DNS-321, DNR-322L, DNS-323, DNS-325, DNS-326, DNS-327L, DNR-326, DNS-340L, DNS-343, DNS-345, DNS-726-4, DNS-1100-4, DNS-1200-05 and DNS-1550-04 up to 20260205. The affected element is the function cgi_adduser_to_session of the file /cgi-bin/account_mgr.cgi. This manipulation of the argument read_list causes stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5214 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 60 Dnr-202l, Dnr-322l, Dnr-326 and 57 more | 2026-04-03 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability was found in D-Link DNS-120, DNR-202L, DNS-315L, DNS-320, DNS-320L, DNS-320LW, DNS-321, DNR-322L, DNS-323, DNS-325, DNS-326, DNS-327L, DNR-326, DNS-340L, DNS-343, DNS-345, DNS-726-4, DNS-1100-4, DNS-1200-05 and DNS-1550-04 up to 20260205. Impacted is the function cgi_addgroup_get_group_quota_minsize of the file /cgi-bin/account_mgr.cgi. The manipulation of the argument Name results in stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made public and could be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5215 | 2 D-link, Dlink | 60 Dnr-202l, Dnr-322l, Dnr-326 and 57 more | 2026-04-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was identified in D-Link DNS-120, DNR-202L, DNS-315L, DNS-320, DNS-320L, DNS-320LW, DNS-321, DNR-322L, DNS-323, DNS-325, DNS-326, DNS-327L, DNR-326, DNS-340L, DNS-343, DNS-345, DNS-726-4, DNS-1100-4, DNS-1200-05 and DNS-1550-04 up to 20260205. The impacted element is the function cgi_get_ipv6 of the file /cgi-bin/network_mgr.cgi. Such manipulation leads to improper access controls. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30287 | 1 Deepthought.industries | 2 Ace Scanner, Pdf Scanner | 2026-04-03 | 8.4 High |
| An arbitrary file overwrite vulnerability in Deep Thought Industries ACE Scanner PDF Scanner v1.4.5 allows attackers to overwrite critical internal files via the file import process, leading to arbitrary code execution or information exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-30289 | 1 Tinybeans | 2 Private Family Album, Private Family Album App | 2026-04-03 | 8.4 High |
| An arbitrary file overwrite vulnerability in Tinybeans Private Family Album App v5.9.5-prod allows attackers to overwrite critical internal files via the file import process, leading to arbitrary code execution or information exposure. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13855 | 3 Ibm, Linux, Microsoft | 5 Aix, Storage Protect, Storage Protect Server and 2 more | 2026-04-03 | 7.6 High |
| IBM Storage Protect Server 8.2.0 IBM Storage Protect Plus Server is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5291 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-04-03 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inappropriate implementation in WebGL in Google Chrome prior to 146.0.7680.178 allowed a remote attacker to obtain potentially sensitive information from process memory via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-4748 | 1 Freebsd | 1 Freebsd | 2026-04-03 | 7.5 High |
| A regression in the way hashes were calculated caused rules containing the address range syntax (x.x.x.x - y.y.y.y) that only differ in the address range(s) involved to be silently dropped as duplicates. Only the first of such rules is actually loaded into pf. Ranges expressed using the address[/mask-bits] syntax were not affected. Some keywords representing actions taken on a packet-matching rule, such as 'log', 'return tll', or 'dnpipe', may suffer from the same issue. It is unlikely that users have such configurations, as these rules would always be redundant. Affected rules are silently ignored, which can lead to unexpected behaviour including over- and underblocking. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27101 | 1 Dell | 1 Secure Connect Gateway | 2026-04-03 | 4.7 Medium |
| Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) 5.0 Appliance and Application version(s) 5.28.00.xx to 5.32.00.xx, contain(s) an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. A high privileged attacker within the management network could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to remote execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28265 | 1 Dell | 14 Powerstore, Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t and 11 more | 2026-04-03 | 4.4 Medium |
| PowerStore, contains a Path Traversal vulnerability in the Service user. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to modification of arbitrary system files. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4370 | 1 Canonical | 1 Juju | 2026-04-03 | 10 Critical |
| A vulnerability was identified in Juju from version 3.2.0 until 3.6.19 and from version 4.0 until 4.0.4, where the internal Dqlite database cluster fails to perform proper TLS client and server authentication. Specifically, the Juju controller's database endpoint does not validate client certificates when a new node attempts to join the cluster. An unauthenticated attacker with network reachability to the Juju controller's Dqlite port can exploit this flaw to join the database cluster. Once joined, the attacker gains full read and write access to the underlying database, allowing for total data compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-0932 | 1 M-files | 1 M-files Server | 2026-04-03 | 7.3 High |
| Blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in legacy connection methods of document co-authoring features in M-Files Server before 26.3 allow an unauthenticated attacker to cause the server to send HTTP GET requests to arbitrary URLs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22767 | 1 Dell | 1 Appsync | 2026-04-03 | 7.3 High |
| Dell AppSync, version(s) 4.6.0, contain(s) an UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering. | ||||